Background and Aim: Throughout history, various factors have prevented citizens from achieving their rights. One of the most important is gender. The situation of women in Iran has undergone many changes throughout history, and today it needs to identify needs and find legal solutions in various aspects. In the text of the "Charter of Citizenship Rights", the priority of respecting women's rights is considered as half of the society. However, the necessary efforts have not been made to identify the weaknesses and to observe them accurately and unconditionally, and observing them has faced many challenges. Given these points, it is essential for us to study and identify the challenges of women's citizenship rights. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the level of women's awareness of their citizenship rights, counting women's citizenship rights in the Charter of Citizenship Rights, as well as their expectations from the government. Materials and Method: In this research, using library method, to collect and study the required resources and by comparing the data obtained from the study, try to select and benefit from the most accurate information in books, documents and sites that can be used. Access has been provided to describe and explain the subject. Findings: The results showed that after the constitutional period, governments have always tried to improve women's citizenship rights. But some articles of the Charter are in stark contrast to the text of the law. Also, the lack of a mechanism for teaching citizenship rights, especially to women, and the lack of the necessary executive guarantees and less attention to violence against women are among the most important challenges to the Charter of Citizenship Rights. Conclution: The situation of women's civil rights in Iran is the result of a complex set of historical, social, religious and political factors, and any change in this field requires full knowledge of these areas. It should not be assumed that the existence of laws, even the constitution's attention to civil rights, alone guarantees these rights in society. Citizenship is a culture that needs to be learned and institutionalized over time.

Purpose: Regarding the need for the implementation of citizenship charter in Iran’s state organizations, the present study tried to deal with this issue. Methodology: The approach of the research was quantitative and exploratory factor analysis was applied in 35 organizations to identify and categorize the ruling principles of the implementation of citizenship charter. Findings: Results show that the principles fall into four categories: 1. transparency, value creation, and client tribute,2. enhancing availability, innovation, and non-stop evaluation,3. identifying clients and comprehensive supervision,4. providing facilities and opportunity for filing grievances and creating substitute jobs. With regard to these imperative principles ruling the citizenship charter implementation, we now know that the value for the following principles is below the average of 3: transparency and dissemination of information, enhancing availability and encouraging the right of choice, humility, innovation and improvement, upkeeping the criteria of good service, giving opportunity for choosing substitute services, supervision and appraisal, providing means for client grievance filing, identifying clients, surveying clients and employees for improving services. It is recommended that state agencies take measures to improve all these principles. Originality: Taking the work of former administrations to implement citizenship charter in government organizations of the country into account, this study, by identifying the ruling principles of citizenship charter and introducing them as a reference, has made a noticeable attempt to contribute to both the theoretical and empirical knowledge applicable for the improvement of services in state agencies and to protect the rights of citizens in the administrative system accountability.

Objectives: Citizenship Rights Charters are indicators of how societies have considered social relationships and future life. They include the latest scientific outcomes about the ideal human society. Besides, these charters can be thought as the agreed perspectives in order to maintain, enhance, and correct social system.Among different variables that are discussed in these charters, some of them have greater importance. These variables include the way that people see life and people's fundamental responsibilities toward themselves, others, the world, and future life.The purpose of this study is to study the most famous and practical citizenship charters and documents worldwide, and then propose a logical citizenship rights charter.Method: The methodologies used in this research include comparative study, qualitative content analysis, and logical analysis. In the comparative study method, the selected citizenship charters have been compared with each other from different aspects. In the qualitative content analysis method, the focus is on how data (terms & words) are used in different charters and documents. Likewise, in the logical Analytical method, the relationship between different principles and their scope has been studied, and some fundamental principles and theories have been introduced. Then, the logical proposed framework has been designed through this methodology.Findings: According to the content reasoning of a set of citizenship rights charters, it seems that achievement of a citizenship rights charter for human beings requires the acceptance of similar respect, freedom, welfare, information, and progress rights. Of course, there is a very important task for society members in return; which is "Responsible Collaboration in the Social System" or "Fulfilling the rights of the society in having responsible collaboration of its members".Results: All urban laws and rules should be based on a set of logical principles, and urban service providers should resolve any obstacle that may deny these principles. As a result, each citizenship right charter will be developed in two categories:1) General principles which consist of the suggested rights introduced in the findings section2) The concluded principles which ensure the execution of the above principles in the city environmentTherefore, the following principles are introduced and identified in the proposed Logical Citizenship Rights Charter:- All people have the right to be respected in the same way- All people have the right to have freedom- All people have the right to have complete security- All people have the right to have relative welfare- All people have the right to have enough information & knowledge to actively participate in the social arenas- All people have the right to plan for their progress and excellence- All people are responsible against the prosperity of others.

One of the main features of legal rules is having a sanction, and without a sanction, they lose their effective function. If we consider the implementation of citizenship rights rules as a subset of public law to require effective sanction, we must seek government adherence to these rules among its enforcement guarantees, because sanctions are a response to violators of legal rules that include various types of criminal sanctions. The main areas of realization of citizenship rights are the government and the field of public services. Examples of citizenship rights in the administrative system specifically refer to the eleven titles mentioned in Article 2 of the ratification of the Charter of Citizenship Rights in the Administrative System. Almost nowhere in the penal system are criminal guarantees explicitly mentioned against these eleven cases, but by carefully examining the concepts of the mentioned rights on the one hand and various studies in criminal law on the other hand, the cases can be reconciled. In this way, he discovered and clarified the criminal sanctions. The purpose of this article is to study the criminal sanctions of citizenship rights stipulated in the resolution of the Supreme Administrative Council regarding the Charter of citizenship Rights in the administrative system. The research method is descriptive-analytical with the library method. The available results prove that the Charter of citizenship Rights in the administrative system have several criminal sanctions that emphasize the performance of the duties of the government and the judiciary in this area.

Citizenship Charter Reflects Government Concern Over Public Awareness on Citizenship and Proposes Respect for Human Rights. In this regard, one of the most important pillars of the civil rights charter is the issue of women's rights. The purpose of the present study is to investigate and analyze the level of attention to women's citizenship rights in the context of the Citizenship Charter. The above study shows that women's citizenship rights are accepted in the Charter of Citizenship to an acceptable extent, but there is no guarantee of proper implementation on the one hand and some practical challenges and on the other hand desirable and realistic research of women's rights in Iran with serious obstacles. Is facing

Women's citizenship rights as one of the most fundamental legal concepts, are a collection of civil, political, and social rights that women benefit through membership in the community and establishing relationships with the state. In the Islamic Republic of Iran, these rights are protected by the Constitution, the charter on citizens’ rights and other laws and regulations. This research aims are based on the theory of citizenship rights t. H. Marshall, a comparative study of the status of the concept of women's citizenship rights and the recognition of their civil, political and social rights in both the constitution and civil rights charter, as well as the limiting factors of this concept in both legal documents. This research aims to extract the principles of women's citizenship rights through descriptive research and analysis of the contents of the two documents in a documentation and library form, it expresses the objective and qualitative results of the situation. The results of this study show that the concept of women's citizenship rights has a higher status in the constitution than the charter on citizens’ rights. the factor limiting the Concept of Women's Citizenship Rights the need for observance of the specified conditions, including the non-disturbance of the principles of Islam, non-opposition to Islam, etc. that are principles in both documents.

Good administration, as a factor of rule of law in administrational institutions, is looking for protecting the rights of individuals against the government. This right was stipulated for the first time in the EU charter of fundamental rights and was stabilized in the European Court of Justice. Recently this right was stipulated in Iranian judicial system in the Charter on Citizens’ Rights as “ appropriate administration. ” Definitely applying the normative experiences and developments of European Union may be effective in much more clearance and entailment of this right in administrational institutions. Meantime understanding the importance of this right identification in the Charter of Citizens’ Right, the question would be that how much this right and it’ s compilations have affinity with the international standards included in the Charter of Fundamental Rights and what are the privileges and defects of this document in relation to the Charter of Fundamental Rights in the framework of the right to good administration? The inquiry shows that, generally the Charter on Citizens’ Rights has a substantial affinity with the Charter of Fundamental Rights in introducing the compilations of the right to good administration, but in most cases due to objectiveness and transparency of the definitions and the domain, the right is far away from the criterion projected for and has got a better approach in accordance to the Charter of Fundamental Rights, just in introducing the methods of compensating.

Citizenship rights are the set of fundamental rights that a person has as a citizen, which includes the principle of legitimate freedom, the principle of acquittal, the right to access a lawyer, the right to access a competent court, etc. The constitution has given special attention to these rights and the Islamic Council has protected them in the law respecting legitimate freedoms and protecting the rights of citizens. Every human being is a human being regardless of his/her thoughts, ethnicity, and language, and as a human being, he/she has human dignity and rank, for this reason, his human dignity cannot be undermined with any excuse. On the other hand, every person in any society has a series of fundamental and necessary rights that must be respected and protected by the government. Based on this, the present research aims to compare the single article of the Law on Respecting Legitimate Freedoms and Protecting Citizen Rights and answer the question whether the concept of freedom and examples of freedom are the same in both human rights and citizenship rights documents. This article is of a descriptive-analytical type and its results showed that due to the security orientation of the new law in accepting citizenship rights, the legislator has considered the aspects of caution and in some cases has set some limits regarding the claim of moral damages.